Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive16.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory108.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150107
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 15 '17 at 09:25
Run Duration948 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 143
58% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 488
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gainward(10B0 1189) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 42.5
28% 36.8 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 34.2
33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 31%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.1% Very good
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 106
Parallax 146
55% 106 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 137
Splatting 112
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
286GB free
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
286GB free
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
286GB free
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
286GB free
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Micron_M600_MTFD 1TB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 309
Write 22.8
Mixed 14.9
24% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 0.48
9% 5.08 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 8.21
8% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
29GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
29GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
29GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
29GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
29GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
198GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 34.1
Mixed 8.78
31% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.17
55% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 750GB
31GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 80.4
Write 77
Mixed 61.7
92% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.15
33% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 38%
Teclast CoolFlash USB3.0 32GB
30GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 102
Write 79.1
Mixed 24.3
78% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.47
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.05
87% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Teclast CoolFlash USB3.0 32GB
30GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.3% Very poor
Read 39
Write 17.6
Mixed 19.7
29% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.76
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.78
63% 2.03 MB/s
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 34.2
Mixed 20.6
38% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.25
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.75
83% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 30.9
Mixed 18.4
35% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.51
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.79
97% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18%
Great: 28%
SanDisk 32GB
23GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 3.37
Mixed 6.3
10% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.16
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 1.18
85% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $378
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback