Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110823
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 15 '17 at 09:09
Run Duration389 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 118
61% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 206
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 2.61
2% 1.98 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 96
Mixed 25.9
52% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power2G 2GB
0GB free, PID 3e00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 2.84
Mixed 4.41
7% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 4.46
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.009
17% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KBL78B452G21H920 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback