Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150108
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMay 16 '21 at 10:23
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 87%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 21.8
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 189
48% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 275
34% 260 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 75
Parallax 49.8
42% 58.8 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 44
39% 48 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG430400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 347
Mixed 289
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 6.4
39% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 84.1
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 8.7
28% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 60%
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB
132GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 121 114 96 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 112
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.5 4.9 5.5 5.2 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Read 9.4
Write 2
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 5.3
6% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 307
13% 307 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback