Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150108
Uptime	7.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '20 at 16:58
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200 2,511 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 506 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.6% Average	Lighting 50.3 Reflection 53.8 Parallax 48.2 41% 50.8 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 48 Splatting 42.3 40% 49.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 102 28 248 300 23 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 381 Write 434 Mixed 332 SusWrite 179 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 33.6 125% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 167 155% 235 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 102%
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB 3,993 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 123GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 98 99 99 98 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 95.7 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 98 66% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.9% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	85x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	32x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	31x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	59x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	33x
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	26x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
M500 240GBCrucial $79Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	16x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	17x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	13x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 3,272 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16