Today's hottest deals

HP 750-102ng

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 750-102ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 50.9
30% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 73
8-Core 86.3
10% 79.7 Pts
64-Core 90
6% 90 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.93
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 43.1
Parallax 41.8
33% 41.8 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 0.1
18% 25.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 70 84 53 80 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 356
Write 170
Mixed 210
SusWrite 81.5
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 22.2
77% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 184
152% 218 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 174 177 180 179 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 139
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 178
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-102ng Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 750-102ng

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback