Lenovo 81W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81W1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 144
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 217
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 8.5
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12.1
8% 9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1034 1089 354 346 347 349 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,387
Write 1,266
Mixed 1,211
SusWrite 586
250% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60.8
197% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 673
489% 644 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%
WDC WD32 00BEKX-75B7WT0 320GB
180GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 34
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 37.4
46% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81W1 Builds (Compare 1,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback