Dell OptiPlex 755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 755
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 755  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 17:21
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6850-$57
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 64.6
38% 56 Pts
4-Core 65
8-Core 66.5
9% 65.8 Pts
64-Core 64.6
4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Lighting 9.33
Reflection 8.23
Parallax 9.94
8% 9.17 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 8.13
Splatting 7.65
7% 9.06 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 220 228 237 238 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.7% Very good
Read 248
Write 239
Mixed 229
SusWrite 228
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 37
122% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2013)-$55
244GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 96
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 102
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 59%
WDC WD32 00BEKX-75B7WT0 320GB
245GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 25
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 25.5
36% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 755 Builds (Compare 499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback