Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 19:15
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 89
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 195
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 171
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3648) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.8
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 434
Mixed 419
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.9
194% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 57.8
120% 243 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
146GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.3
Write 19.9
Mixed 57.4
41% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
3GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.2
Write 8.2
Mixed 2
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 6,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback