HP p7-1142

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1142  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACD
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 01:41
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 90.4
45% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 148
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 25
Parallax 30.9
28% 29.9 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 31.6
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 63 1.4 43 51 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 158
Write 35.6
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 51
16% 72 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 8.2
38% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 21.7
DQ Mixed 19.4
15% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1142 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p7-1142

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback