EXO Smart S3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemEXO Smart S3  (all builds)
MotherboardEXO CM218
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 23:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 177
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 234
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.37 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 106 104 113 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 106
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 67%
WDC WD32 00BPVT-24JJ5T0 320GB
174GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 36 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 30.1
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 35
42% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Smart S3 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: EXO Smart S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback