Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Memory 13.9 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 117 35% 68.5 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 126 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 6.2 4% 5.2 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 9.1 6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GM2256G 256GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 291 378 324 333 327 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 369 Write 348 Mixed 348 SusWrite 330 79% 349 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 20.2 69% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 174 130% 173 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 94%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 919GB free Firmware: RSM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 130 123 127 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 110 Write 88.8 Mixed 55 SusWrite 125 69% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 369 11% 369 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	16x
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples	7x

SSD
GM2256G 256GBBench 72%, 24 samples	16x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	2x
Savage 240GBHyperX $118Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x

RAM
K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GBHynixBench 45%, 25 samples	15x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 42%, 213 samples	7x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 39%, 1 sample	1x