Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3067-A1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120124
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 15:09
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 439
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P3000
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTFAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 216 194 155 197 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 235
Write 212
Mixed 218
SusWrite 184
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 24.4
75% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 166
127% 170 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52%
Great: 106%
Samsung SSD 860 PRO 512G 512GB
476GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
Read 31.1
Write 21.1
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 26.4
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 6.7
471% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W510 POWER Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback