Today's hottest deals

RM DESKTOP 310

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRM DESKTOP 310  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111111
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 11:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SKTH, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 140
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 206
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 4.84
4% 4.74 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.22
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$34
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 52 45 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 326
Write 258
Mixed 221
SusWrite 81.1
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 20.5
78% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 38.3
32% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 85%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 107
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
383GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 24 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 20.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 23.5
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP 310 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: RM DESKTOP 310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback