Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121010
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 10:58
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 67.2 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 172 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 311 41% 310 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 470.25 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 3.9 10% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 26 48 31 33 35 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.3% Very poor	Read 148 Write 130 Mixed 118 SusWrite 34.3 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 8.8 18% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 78%
Seagate ST320DM001 HD322GJ 320GB 590 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 249GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 124 144 143 139 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 107 Write 145 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 138 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.2 222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 82%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100 8,795 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 251GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 33 51 36 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 48.1 Write 42.8 Mixed 38 SusWrite 39 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 47%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 461GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 75 72 70 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 71.2 Write 70.6 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 70.4 48% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 298GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 33 Write 27.3 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 11.9 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 21%
WDC WD64 00BPVT-60HXZT1 640GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 175GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.5 11 11 10 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 28.4 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 10.3 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 31%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 890GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 38 37 36 37 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 33.4 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 36.1 45% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MQ01ACF050 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 466GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.3 6 5.9 6.2 7.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 28.2 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 6.4 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 52%
SAMSUNG HD103SM 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.3 6 6 6.2 7.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.9% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 32.7 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 6.2 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 152% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 25%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 834GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 31 Mixed 26 SusWrite 0.1 29% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 38%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 360GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 33.6 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 0.1 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB 3,888 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 6.6 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	180x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	158x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	104x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16