Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '18 at 19:17
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 134
57% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 394
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 65.6
0% 33.2 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 42.6
35% 42.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 142
Write 128
Mixed 101
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.03
6% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 112%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
993GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 30.4
Mixed 29.2
39% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.05
6% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 20%
Generic Storage Device 64GB
29GB free, PID 1336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 11.7
Mixed 12.8
17% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.04
3% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.7% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback