Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '21 at 18:45
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 78.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 825 79% 654 Pts	64-Core 1,277 79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.3% Good	Lighting 75 Reflection 75 Parallax 149 61% 99.7 fps	MRender 80.5 Gravity 106 Splatting 74.8 70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 3,133 Write 25.2 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 22 168% 808 MB/s	4K Read 272 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.6 416% 92 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB 1,069 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 96GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 73 84 80 146 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 660GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 79 79 78 77 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 83 Write 58.5 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 77.3 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 756GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 169 169 169 173 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 124 Write 84.4 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 169 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 95.3 Mixed 87.6 SusWrite 93.5 70% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 500GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 355GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 33.4 Write 32.2 Mixed 27 SusWrite 16.1 36% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 20%
ST332041 8AS 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 21GB free, PID 2756 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 23 Write 24 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 20.3 30% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 33%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00RKKA0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 617GB free, PID 2756 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.8% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 22.2 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 3 22% 17 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3466C1994/8G KHX3466C19D4/8G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2933, 2933 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98.9% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 30.9 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 27.1 SC Write 37.7 SC Mixed 29.6 90% 31.5 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,418x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	544x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	535x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	323x
RTX 2060Nvidia $269Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	232x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	210x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	157x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $658

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363