Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 891
82% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,285
80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 88
Parallax 152
88% 116 fps
MRender 87.8
Gravity 110
Splatting 126
90% 108 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 38 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 4,918
Write 41.5
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 37.5
264% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 426
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 4.7
652% 144 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 372%
Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
221GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 87 120 89 90 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
79GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 24 26 25 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 20.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 24.7
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
814GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 203 203 202 202 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 122
Write 111
Mixed 76
SusWrite 202
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 111 111 111 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 112
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 104 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 102
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 83%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00RKKA0 1TB
855GB free, PID 2756
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 79 78 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
Read 132
Write 136
Mixed 90
SusWrite 78.2
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 500GB
466GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 36
Write 32.2
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 33.2
44% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 20%
ST332041 8AS 320GB
21GB free, PID 2756
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 79 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 78.2
Mixed 54
SusWrite 78.4
98% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3466C1994/8G KHX3466C19D4/8G 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 32.1
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 29.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback