Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 120
46% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 170
17% 136 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PwrHis(1787 A56D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 28
Parallax 32.2
20% 28.2 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 19.9
19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 151 81 58 80 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 170
Write 162
Mixed 151
SusWrite 97.4
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 24
73% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 34.4
31% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 91%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
245GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 162 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 169
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 161
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 14.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback