Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive9.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140327
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 80.3
43% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 133
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
AMD(1002 990C) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.4
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 7.4
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 40 3.2 12 59 6.9 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.3% Terrible
Read 6
Write 32
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 27.6
4% 19 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 8.1
21% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 9.8
8% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 9.3%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40
169GB free
Firmware: K2AOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 30 32 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 53.8
Write 45
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 31.6
28% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback