Lenovo 81W2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81W2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 11:37
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 30.9
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 145
43% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 388
37% 306 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002P6LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 901 873 833 938 932 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,268
Write 937
Mixed 839
SusWrite 884
220% 982 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 51.6
162% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 262
250% 394 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 176%
Great: 238%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 12.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81W2 Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $216Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback