Apple MacBookPro11,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro11,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-189A3D4F975D5FFC
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 12:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4578U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 175
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 223
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 7.2
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512F 500GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM2JA1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 508 541 506 518 483 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343147533641465238412D50422020 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,1 Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback