bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1717 x 966 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '16 at 17:27
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4578U
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 65.1
50% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 67.1
8-Core 66
9% 66.6 Pts
64-Core 72
4% 72 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 256MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 11.2.32626.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 2.62
2% 2.01 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 3.78
2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 (disk1) 1TB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.YDN48G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 52
Mixed 45.9
38% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.09
31% 0.25 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback