Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 17:05
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 69
2-Core 125
58% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 300
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
MSI(1462 2450) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 19.2
17% 20.3 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 11.7
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 63 32 1.8 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 359
Write 218
Mixed 142
SusWrite 41.4
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 9.5
48% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 20.3
DQ Mixed 21.3
16% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 53%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
391GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 63 33 2.3 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 84.8
Write 76.4
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 42.2
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
235GB free
Firmware: 0003BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 65 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 54.6
Write 64.6
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 63.8
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 43 40 49 49 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 118
Write 37.4
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 42.3
72% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
65% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5402-061.A00LF BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5402-061.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback