Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 128
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 307
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 66 16 8.3 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 376
Write 282
Mixed 151
SusWrite 37.8
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 5
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 21.9
15% 19 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 53%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
559GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 81 82 20 11 2.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 96.1
Write 88.9
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 44.4
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
101GB free
Firmware: 0003BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 56 56 58 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 20.9
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 55.5
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 20 19 17 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 18.9
Mixed 15
SusWrite 18
25% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
98% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5402-061.A00LF BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5402-061.A00LF 12GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.9% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback