PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Aspire TC-885 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Aspire TC-885 |
Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180508 |
Uptime | 2.7 Days |
Run Date | Apr 04 '21 at 08:55 |
Run Duration | 230 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
89%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Sapphire(174B 5454) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
198GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 467 415 293 293 294 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
524GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 466 474 481 481 481 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 343 347 348 343 347 MB/s
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB
158GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 397 403 402 404 405 MB/s
|
72.3%
Very good
|
|||
Asmt 2115 128GB
101GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 62 60 62 62 62 MB/s
|
47.4%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 16 10 10 10 10 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
|
4.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Adata DashDrive Elite UE700 32GB-$20
29GB free, PID de7a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata AO2P26KC8T1-BPYS 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
83.2%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 760x |
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 511x |
Core i3-9100Intel $145Bench 80%, 7,621 samples | 162x |
GPU | |
---|---|
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples | 521x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 165x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 159x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $131 |