Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '21 at 02:41
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 188 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 415 54% 409 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3557) 1GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 23.8 15% 20.1 fps	MRender 22.2 Gravity 17.4 Splatting 17.7 15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 50 77 128 174 177 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 191 Write 80.6 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 122 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 99GB free Firmware: 3.AAJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 0 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 54.7 Write 59.3 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 5.3 30% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 43%
Verbatim Store n Go Drive 8GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 0238 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.1 3 2.8 3 1 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.85% Terrible	Read 10 Write 6.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 2.1 7% 5.75 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.85% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 28.7 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 22.5 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	33x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	25x
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $98Bench 68%, 93,718 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	22x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	12x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16