Tyrone DS410TOG-424RT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTyrone DS410TOG-424RT  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7119GMRE
Memory247.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , , , , , , , , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 10:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4108
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 136
59% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 515
46% 391 Pts
64-Core 1,408
87% 1,408 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250620NS 250GB-$45
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AEK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 1.6 2.7 38 46 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 58
Write 42.6
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 22.8
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
13GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 7.6 3 3.3 3.6 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Read 34.8
Write 20.3
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 6.6
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.8
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 16.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback