Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 760

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 760
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 760  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '21 at 20:35
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 55
34% 49.2 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 108
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
Dell(1028 027F)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ADH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 49 59 37 26 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 66.9
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 42.6
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 41%
Jmicron Generic 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 30
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 5.8
18% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 48%
Jmicron Generic 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 29.4
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 5.8
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 38%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
37GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 29.7
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 5.8
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 63%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
11GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 22
SusWrite 5.8
16% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 65%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
732GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 29.1
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 5.8
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK01 500GB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5 5.1 5 5 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 27.7
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 5
28% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 50%
JMicron Generic DISK00 640GB
36GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.02% Terrible
Read 30.6
Write 20.7
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 0.6
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 760 Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback