Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X99  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 30 '17 at 12:34
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 201
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 733
70% 579 Pts
64-Core 2,032
126% 2,032 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8485) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 38.7
28% 34.5 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 34.7
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 511
Write 400
Mixed 419
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 30.4
99% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 129
145% 250 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
198GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 501
Write 257
Mixed 304
78% 354 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 16.3
77% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 81.3
112% 207 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 91%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
316GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 96.9
Mixed 95.6
72% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
180GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 77.9
Write 74.7
Mixed 92
62% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.26
85% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 59.6
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 48.2
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 133%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback