Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-E-10G WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E-10G WS  (all builds)
Memory122.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 11:55
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 127
55% 90 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 509
45% 382 Pts
64-Core 2,225
138% 2,225 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.52
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 91.2
Reflection 118
Parallax 115
74% 108 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 105
Splatting 106
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1435 1691 1711 1747 1812 1852 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,454
Write 1,807
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 1,708
406% 1,818 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 55.1
188% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 487
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 492
352% 453 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 280%
Great: 425%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
358GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1408 1483 1486 1492 1488 1490 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,418
Write 1,495
Mixed 853
SusWrite 1,474
295% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 47.6
159% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 553
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 444
336% 455 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 217%
Great: 241%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
432GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1477 1483 1482 1486 1486 1486 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,481
Write 1,463
Mixed 975
SusWrite 1,483
304% 1,350 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 47.9
160% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 444
336% 455 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 220%
Great: 241%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
404GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 855 1426 1426 1422 1420 1423 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,878
Write 1,424
Mixed 796
SusWrite 1,329
303% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 51.2
177% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 791
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 450
373% 548 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 238%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-012.A02G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 9965600-011.A01G 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 59.2
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 47.5
152% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 130%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E-10G WS Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E-10G WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $996
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback