Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5335 166 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 22.9 2-Core 46 35% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 88.9 8-Core 83.7 12% 86.3 Pts	64-Core 80.6 5% 80.6 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset 33,874 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 836D) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.34 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 0.52 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.91 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 90.4 Write 82.1 Mixed 23.8 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.33 97% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 54%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 0619 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Read 13.1 Write 3.69 Mixed 5.02 8% 7.28 MB/s	4K Read 3.95 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.006 15% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	17x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	17x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $100Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	15x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	30x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	17x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
JD120 120GBJamesdonkeyBench 62%, 1,575 samples	4x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $223