PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | RM ONE 310 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel DQ67OW |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111111 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | Mar 11 '21 at 17:47 |
Run Duration | 259 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.2.3
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 119 74 50 41 40 MB/s
|
58.5%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
199GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 102 96 92 88 73 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
UFD USB Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID 6200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 7.2 7.6 6.9 7.5 7.2 MB/s
|
7.43%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
4GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.3 4 4.1 4.3 MB/s
|
5.25%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic External 320GB
180GB free, PID 3960
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 10 7.5 7.9 8.8 11 MB/s
|
4.61%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 9x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 8x |
Core i3-2120Intel $147Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 8x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 3x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $90 |