PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | RM ONE 310 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel DQ67OW |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111111 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Apr 10 '21 at 17:30 |
Run Duration | 217 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1
|
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 38 39 41 41 42 MB/s
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
70GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 122 122 122 122 MB/s
|
59.5%
Above average
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
11GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.8 3.9 3.8 4 4.2 MB/s
|
5.75%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic External 1TB
463GB free, PID 3960
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 13 9.6 13 MB/s
|
8.78%
Terrible
|
|||
UFD USB Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID 6200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 6.1 6.9 6.2 7.2 5.7 MB/s
|
8.07%
Terrible
|
|||
Flash Disk 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 14 17 11 17 MB/s
|
7.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.9 4.1 3.6 3.1 4.3 MB/s
|
4.07%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 10x |
Core i5-2400Intel $71Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 8x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 8x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 3x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $85 |