Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory61.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2295
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 763
67% 571 Pts
64-Core 2,364
146% 2,364 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Nvidia(10DE 2788) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
207% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 294
Parallax 357
245% 317 fps
MRender 357
Gravity 261
Splatting 189
211% 269 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 207%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_7300_MTFDHBA960TDF 960GB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 95420100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 880 796 799 869 869 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,107
Write 920
Mixed 747
SusWrite 848
203% 905 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 51.7
203% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 711
539% 719 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 190%
Great: 195%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
5GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 5.8 8 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 12.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 10.5
22% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.8
120% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G9E1 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 38.8
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback