Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 04:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 264
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 573
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 57
Parallax 8
6% 23.9 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 3.7
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 323 619 387 173 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 809
Write 774
Mixed 672
SusWrite 342
146% 649 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 37.2
107% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 701
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 541
425% 592 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 115%
Great: 130%
Micron_7300_MTFDHBA960TDF 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 95420100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 633 811 850 832 795 739 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 728
Write 863
Mixed 498
SusWrite 777
162% 716 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 20
114% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.9
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 720
471% 523 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 129%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FER 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 27.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback