Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 04:24
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 196
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 641
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 1044
65% 1044 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 46.7
32% 41.7 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 26.7
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 55 45 77 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 89.3
Write 89.7
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 63.6
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
641GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 59 190 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 174
Write 109
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 74.2
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 119%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
15GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 35 32 35 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 32.4
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 33.7
40% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
43% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 33%
Skymedi SK7305 HDD 120GB
82GB free, PID 7305
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 147 148 151 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
142% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 162
Mixed 176
SusWrite 150
231% 175 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 18.9
1,532% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 22.2
2,012% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 142%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback