Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 294
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 925
94% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2452 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 126
Parallax 78.9
64% 94.5 fps
MRender 86.5
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 76.2
65% 80.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79
0GB free
Firmware: M208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 324 328 329 328 319 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 318
Mixed 300
SusWrite 326
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 36.7
148% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 206
155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 95%
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 477 360 295 295 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 472
Mixed 463
SusWrite 367
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 68.1
230% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 205
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 125%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
0GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 92 89 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 99
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 91.9
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$40
0GB free
Firmware: SM31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 77
SusWrite 79.4
69% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.2
256% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4RL.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.1
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 37.1
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback