Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire VN7-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 87% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire VN7-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire VN7-571G
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, , 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 06:43
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 87%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 72.2
50% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 94.4
8-Core 166
16% 130 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 091C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.74% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 5.4
2% 8.1 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$40
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 37 33 23 44 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 58.3
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 33.3
27% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.5% Average
MC Read 13
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire VN7-571G Builds (Compare 335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire VN7-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback