Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 52.5 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 96.4 42% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 149 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M 9,073 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 040A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 256GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 187 125 74 75 77 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.2% Average	Read 206 Write 186 Mixed 155 SusWrite 126 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 20 60% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 146 114% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 126%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 0GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 27.2 Write 24.5 Mixed 22.4 31% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 68% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-073.A00LF 9905428-051.A00LF 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 10.2 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples	396x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	16x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	32x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	20x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	20x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $98