Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A31
Motherboard	MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170222
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '17 at 15:20
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	LAO-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 58.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 205 67% 123 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 695 64% 538 Pts	64-Core 1,152 71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 189 Parallax 179 134% 177 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 178 Splatting 129 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 830GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 36 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 16 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 56 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 434362337	91.6% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 398 Mixed 393 95% 428 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 32.7 128% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 74.7 88% 155 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 133%
KINGSTON SHFS37A240G 240GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 207GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	159% Outstanding	Read 242 Write 187 Mixed 198 260% 209 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 10.9 1,312% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.7 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 10.9 1,763% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 159%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4-240 2x16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 9.1 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	11x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $113Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $80Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	10x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	9x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $1,042