MSI X370!XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A31
MotherboardMSI X370!XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 09:26
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User LAO-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 849
77% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,226
76% 1,226 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 190
Parallax 197
141% 187 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 183
Splatting 126
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
485GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 445 366 384 409 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 446
Mixed 409
SusWrite 408
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 50.3
165% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 42
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 55.5
46% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
252GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1135 1035 983 1040 977 1016 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,429
Write 1,120
Mixed 914
SusWrite 1,031
304% 1,374 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.2
220% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 54.2
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 79.1
77% 116 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 235%
Great: 363%
External USB3.0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 130 130 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 67.2
Write 125
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 132
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 97%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
26GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.7 0.1 7.8 7.6 4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 16.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 3.5
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-240 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 26.8
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 24.5
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370!XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370!XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $754
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback