Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 01:34
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 844
87% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 257
Parallax 294
240% 282 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 246
Splatting 177
195% 248 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 200%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 808 483 349 364 350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,591
Write 1,743
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 622
301% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 66.1
218% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 438
431% 710 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 207%
Great: 276%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124
585GB free
Firmware: MEAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 75 74 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43% Average
Read 75.9
Write 78.5
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 73.7
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43%
Great: 66%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$206
819GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 93
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 93.1
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$112
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 58 93 92 86 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47% Average
Read 78.3
Write 106
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 83.9
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
235% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47%
Great: 88%
WDC WD30 EURS-63R8UY0 3TB
883GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 33.4
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
350GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.7% Terrible
Read 38.1
Write 37.4
Mixed 31
SusWrite 4.3
36% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $923
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback