Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 04:48
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 155
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 860
91% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 113
Parallax 250
110% 166 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 131
Splatting 157
112% 133 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 815 812 821 825 824 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,569
Write 1,701
Mixed 1,381
SusWrite 926
314% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 84.3
300% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 1,237
918% 1,218 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 266%
Great: 276%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
220GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 92
Mixed 85
SusWrite 104
70% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124
440GB free
Firmware: MEAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 71 68 72 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 64
Write 65.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 70.3
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 66%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$206
554GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 125 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 124
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 98%
External USB3.0 500GB
159GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 105
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 63%
WDC WD30 EURS-63R8UY0 3TB
362GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 15 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 34.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 17.8
38% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
303GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 15 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 17.8
41% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 35.2
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 34.6
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $923
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback