Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '17 at 16:24
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 266
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 1,087
95% 811 Pts
64-Core 1,430
88% 1,430 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 48.4
33% 42.2 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 34.6
35% 44.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
477GB free
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,936
470% 2,113 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.7
175% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 186
183% 293 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 287%
Great: 353%
OCZ RevoDrive 350 PCIe 480GB-$396
395GB free
Firmware: 2.50 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,837
Write 792
Mixed 995
265% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 23.9
105% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 188
189% 305 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 169%
Great: 172%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
366GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,382
Write 1,487
Mixed 1,593
403% 1,821 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 48.3
161% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 195
195% 315 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 253%
Great: 283%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,379
Write 265
Mixed 433
149% 692 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 21.7
98% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 89.8
134% 255 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 116%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 46.5
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 24.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback