Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 19:03
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 886
92% 740 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 1454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 316
Reflection 295
Parallax 330
258% 314 fps
MRender 342
Gravity 255
Splatting 186
205% 261 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 212%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 32GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,109
Write 688
Mixed 152
142% 650 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 40.8
148% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 91.5
121% 234 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 49%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
144GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 359 342 265 272 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 29.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 29.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback