Asus Commando

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Commando  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081222
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 43
2-Core 86.2
41% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 156
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 93.6
6% 93.6 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
EVGA(3842 1150) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 4.1
8% 8.63 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 4.3
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 205 31 45 55 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 258
Write 229
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 95.9
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1
29% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 47
69% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
668GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 70 71 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 51.2
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 69.4
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 42%
Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB
221GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 69.5
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 67.4
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.1
118% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
12GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.3 5.4 5.9 4.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Read 26
Write 18.5
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 6.1
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
80% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Commando Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Commando

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback