Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171106
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$140
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 238
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 488
56% 439 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
EVGA(3842 2067) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.8% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 92.1
Parallax 103
85% 99.8 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 98
Splatting 85.2
82% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 123 122 114 115 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 488
Mixed 390
SusWrite 155
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 52.3
190% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 152
122% 177 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$240
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 477 473 489 489 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 458
Mixed 388
SusWrite 481
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 52.9
180% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
278GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2288 793 799 796 795 797 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,623
Write 2394
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 1,045
425% 1,901 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 93.3
304% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,208
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 1,021
783% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 312%
Great: 346%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
413GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 126 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 154
Write 144
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 126
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.2 2.8 4 3.6 4.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.3
6% 5.97 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer 128GB
119GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.6 5.9 3 4.5 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.3
8% 7.12 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 11.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback