Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81BQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81BQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180731
Uptime42.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 18:06
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 165
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 194
33% 232 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 39CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 3.16
3% 4.01 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 6.43
4% 4.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 36 29 57 62 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 14.8
Write 30.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 42.2
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0
38% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 71%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.5 5.9 7.1 7.1 7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Read 25
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 5.6
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
90% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81BQ Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81BQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback