Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 17:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 156
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 9.1
6% 6.6 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.3
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,212
Write 804
Mixed 614
193% 877 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 27.1
84% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 418
286% 360 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 203%
APPLE SD Card Reader 260GB
54GB free, PID 8406
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 57 57 51 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 77.1
Write 29.1
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 52.8
54% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
93% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445384533303445452D45474345 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback