Today's hottest deals

Apple Macmini7,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple Macmini7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-35C5E08120C7EEAF
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 05:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 129
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 187
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 0141) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 9.91
5% 7.69 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 10.3
6% 7.06 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 256 256 247 258 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 436
Write 415
Mixed 351
SusWrite 272
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 26.9
90% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 252
213% 311 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445384533303445452D45474345 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Macmini7,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple Macmini7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback